<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Risky Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.projectmanagementguide.org/project-management/a-risky-business/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.projectmanagementguide.org/project-management/a-risky-business</link>
	<description>Your own project management guide</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 06:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Identifying Risk &#124; Project Management Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.projectmanagementguide.org/project-management/a-risky-business#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Identifying Risk &#124; Project Management Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectmanagementguide.org/?p=46#comment-360</guid>
		<description>[...] already talked about the idea of risk management as part of the project. Obviously the first requirement for the rest of the risk management process is actually to have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already talked about the idea of risk management as part of the project. Obviously the first requirement for the rest of the risk management process is actually to have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pawel Brodzinski</title>
		<link>http://www.projectmanagementguide.org/project-management/a-risky-business#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Pawel Brodzinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectmanagementguide.org/?p=46#comment-53</guid>
		<description>It's easier when you use only several values for probability too, e.g.: 0%, 30%, 60%, 90%.

I'd also add that it's important to choose good granularity of risks while identifying them. It's one of problems with risks management when risks are either too detailed or too general because it's hard to confront them with other positions from risk log.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easier when you use only several values for probability too, e.g.: 0%, 30%, 60%, 90%.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also add that it&#8217;s important to choose good granularity of risks while identifying them. It&#8217;s one of problems with risks management when risks are either too detailed or too general because it&#8217;s hard to confront them with other positions from risk log.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
